![]() ![]() The "rules" of the ancients are not scientific laws, and even they tried out the techniques of their predecessors, and kept what worked and discarded what didn't. While the contribution of these old astrologers-and the lasting usefulness of many of their techniques-remains, in my opinion, inarguable, it may be prudent to remember that astrology is not a hard science. Traditional horary astrologers, especially, eschew (sometimes with the same amusing vehemence with which they deny their own fundamentalism) any technique not espoused by William Lilly, Henry Coley, Bonatus, Ptolemy, and other long-dead astrologers. There remains much debate in horary circles on the subject of "well-it-works-forme" strategies of analysis. In later lessons, I will elaborate on these guidelines, as well as add the insight of other astrologers whose methods I might not necessarily employ, but who are widely respected and worth trying out. This lesson gives a method of horary analysis in its broadest strokes. The best I can hope to do in the short space I'm allowing myself is to offer some basic guidelines-which basics should, in fact, be enough to get anyone started reading charts. Volumes have been written about horary astrology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |